EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/000248_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Wed Oct 4 22:15:57 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA244810156; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 22:15:57 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from mail.global1.net by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA244460139; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 22:15:39 -0700
Received: from shell.global1.net ([e-mail] [198.69.121.31]) by mail.global1.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA25846 for <[e-mail]>; Thu, 5 Oct 1995 01:08:09 -0400
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 01:08:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Shadows ?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 3 Oct 1995, Robert Cohen wrote:

> Now I'm not sure what the above is even refering to, but I guess what I
> meant was, if you must get rid of shadows at a certain frame, could you
> use a morph target with all shadows turn off ??  You know, surface morph...

Shadows are an Object panel option and would not be affected by a morph.
It would be similar to a previous morphing question where a person was
trying to morph from one plain object to a clone of that object with a
Displacement Map applied.  It don't work dat way.

                                     -David Warner


--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]